Thursday, August 30, 2012

Mitt the Godfather


One of the great things about watching Mafia movies is the vicarious thrill they give us. Most of us live lives of quiet obscurity, swallowing a thousand daily losses as we creep towards the end of all flesh. Not the gangsters we see on TV: they roar across the scene like grizzly bears, raging and taking and living until their lives are spent in a grotesque fury. None of us really want to kill anyone I hope; ideally few of us have harbored any real fantasies of whacking some smart ass and hauling his body off in a car trunk for a shameful grave in a construction site somewhere. Mafia movies let us live that lifestyle vicariously.

I like the scene in Goodfellas where Paulie, the crew boss, becomes a silent partner in the Bamboo Lounge, a legitimate business. The original owner is appealing to Paulie because certain other mobsters are disrespecting the place and he hopes, by having Paulie as part of the ownership group, that the disrespect will stop - and it does, but at a terrible cost. Paulie uses the Lounge as collateral and begins charging up all kinds of costs for liquor, food, etc. Then he sells that stuff at bottom-line prices. When the bill comes due he torches the place and collects on the insurance. It's win-win for Paulie, but not for the original owner who opines, somberly, that it was a great bar.

I can't see this movie without thinking of Mitt Romney these days. Thanks, Mitt, for ruining one of my favorite films. However even a casual reader of Romney's time at Bain Capital can't help but seeing the parallels. Consider Bain's modus operandi with an old, family owned manufacturing business called Ampad that Bain got its mitts on in 1992:

"Bain bought Ampad in 1992 for just $5 million, financing the rest of the deal with borrowed cash. Within three years, Ampad was paying $60 million in annual debt payments, plus an additional $7 million in management fees. A year later, Bain led Ampad to go public, cashed out about $50 million in stock for itself and its investors, charged the firm $2 million for arranging the IPO and pocketed another $5 million in "management" fees. Ampad wound up going bankrupt, and hundreds of workers lost their jobs, but Bain and Romney weren't crying: They'd made more than $100 million on a $5 million investment."

This is the man who calls himself a "Job Creator"? Looks more like an officially sanctioned mafioso to me. Use other people's money to buy into an undervalued company. Saddle that company with the loan debt you just took out. Then begin looting the company for assets you can sell to pay off the debt you yourself have created, sending middle management wage-earners out into the cold. At the same time bill this company for millions as your "consulting" fee while you destroy it. Then cash out and leave. No loss to you, no real risks.

And what do you do with the money? Hide it overseas where it can't be taxed and, therefore, reinvested in the country you're looting.

Romney learned early in his career that it was better to operate this way than deal with start-ups. The potential for enormous profits was unprecedented - and it went on and on and on, right up until 2000 when Romney was about to bid goodbye to his pirate empire. Nearly his last acquisition was the old family-owned toy company KB Toys, built from the ground up the old-fashioned way with lots of sweat and know-how and risk to the entrepreneur.

" In a typical private-equity fragging, Bain put up a mere $18 million to acquire KB Toys and got big banks to finance the remaining $302 million it needed. Less than a year and a half after the purchase, Bain decided to give itself a gift known as a "dividend recapitalization." The firm induced KB Toys to redeem $121 million in stock and take out more than $66 million in bank loans – $83 million of which went directly into the pockets of Bain's owners and investors, including Romney. 'The dividend recap is like borrowing someone else's credit card to take out a cash advance, and then leaving them to pay it off,' says Heather Slavkin Corzo, who monitors private equity takeovers as the senior legal policy adviser for the AFL-CIO.
Bain ended up earning a return of at least 370 percent on the deal, while KB Toys fell into bankruptcy, saddled with millions in debt. KB's former parent company, Big Lots, alleged in bankruptcy court that Bain's "unjustified" return on the dividend recap was actually "900 percent in a mere 16 months."
What happened to the people who worked for KB toys? They joined the stunned millions of Americans who saw this new economy for what it was: not a manufacturing economy that put people to work, creating an affluent middle class and healthy tax base - this is the New Way. It became clear to everyone everywhere that Bain didn't buy KB toys to turn it around, as Mitt would phrase it. There was never a plan for keeping KB competitive.

Today's economy, championed by Romney and the Right, is built not on creating jobs but on cannibalizing companies and squirreling their money away overseas, tax free. No jobs are built - the only people making any kind of profit in this economy are the educated, skilled financial class. Everybody else is doomed. Just as Bain is dismantling the Sensata auto parts factory and sending it piece by piece to China, so too our whole economy will follow. Currently the employees of Sensata are being paid to train the Chinese workers who will replace them at half their salaries. The employees could walk off in disgust, of course, but people need work - even when it's serving the devil.

This is the Market that the Libertarians speak of with such religious reverence. Without regulation (that dirty word to the Tea Party!), that's the way the money funnels - in one direction, with nothing going back in. The Market is without morality, it is driven by profit.

Is it any wonder that Romney doesn't want us to see his tax returns? Paulie the mafioso in Goodfellas wouldn't want you to see his tax returns either.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Curious Irony, Part II

I read with interest a CNN story (found here: http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/24/us/drought-missouri-dairy-farmers/index.html?hpt=hp_c3) in which a dairy farmer bemoaned the death of a Farm Bill, caught in the internecine battle that has Congress in constipated gridlock, which might have saved his heard. Mark Agall claims, "It was the system that failed us."

I wonder how Farmer Agall feels about Big Government and the Welfare State?

A Curious Irony



As Isaac rumbles onward, threatening to bring a biblical wrath down upon Tampa and the GOP convention, there are a few items on the Party Platform that I think bear looking closely at. In view of the three mass shootings of the past month or so, there seems to be very little actual debate on gun control laws on the platform there, in soggy Tampa, which strikes me as odd - if not criminal. And I'm someone with more than my share of guns, including (but not limited to) two pistols, several hunting rifles and shotguns, and at least one assault rifle bought when they were dirt cheap because the Eastern Bloc was collapsing. I mean, hell, my assault rifle came with a retractable bayonet! How about yours? If the deer I'm hunting tries to climb into my stand with a weapon I can stab him in the jugular.

I'm being tongue-in-cheek, of course. My assault rifle was bought purely and simply as a hedge against the coming zombie apocalypse, which is not to be taken lightly.

But let's take a look at these statistics, shall we? From the coalition for gun-control - no doubt skewed by their gay, brie eating desire to socialize Amerika . . . these are the number for intentional gun deaths per 100, 000.
  1. United States - 13.47
  2. Finland - 6.65
  3. Switzerland - 6.2
  4. France - 5.48
  5. Northern Ireland - 4.72
  6. Austria - 4.48
  7. Norway - 4.23
  8. Canada - 3.95
  9. Belgium - 3.32
  10. Australia - 2.94
Or you could look at nations overall, per capita.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_wit_fir_perca...
#1 South Africa: 0.719782 per 1,000 people
#2 Colombia: 0.509801 per 1,000 people
#3 Thailand: 0.312093 per 1,000 people
#4 Zimbabwe: 0.0491736 per 1,000 people
#5 Mexico: 0.0337938 per 1,000 people
#6 Belarus: 0.0321359 per 1,000 people
#7 Costa Rica: 0.0313745 per 1,000 people
#8 United States: 0.0279271 per 1,000 people
#9 Uruguay: 0.0245902 per 1,000 people
#10 Lithuania: 0.0230748 per 1,000 people

In the first chart we rank number one when compared to our peers in the Western Industrialized World. Thinks look different when we open up the comparison to all kinds of other places, some without household plumbing and democracy and reality TV.  America's number eight in that second chart, but that's hardly comforting when you look at the countries who push us down that far - do we really want to be up there with Colombia and Mexico and Zimbabwe? No offense to South Africa, also, but those are not places that rank high in terms of stability. Are these the countries we want to see ourselves peers with?

Maybe, maybe not. But perhaps our gun freedom is a indicator that we are a more Free society - though most of my friends in Western Europe would scoff at that entirely subjective and jingoistic statement.

According the GOP's party platform, however, they remain adamantly opposed to "Federal licensing of law-abiding gun owners & national gun registration as a violation of the 2nd Amendment and an invasion of privacy of honest citizens."

 Which is a curious statement when compared to their stance on voter ID, in which they seem to turn a 180 degrees and go the other way altogether: "We support state laws that require proof of citizenship at the time of voter registration to protect our electoral system against a significant and growing form of voter fraud. Every time that a fraudulent vote is cast, it effectively cancels out the vote of a legitimate voter," according to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R), who submitted an amendment calling for the addition of language to the draft GOP platform expressing support for state legislation that requires voters to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote. The amendment would build on a prior backing of "true, robust photo ID laws," Kobach said.

So no obtrusive licensing for buying/owning guns which is seen as a violation of the 2nd Ammendment, but a resounding yes to laws that would require a form of "licensing" that would allow people to vote.

In the past month alone we have seen nearly one hundred people killed by guns. However, experts have yet to show that we are troubled by dense hordes of sweaty illegal yard workers voting in insect like masses to push a certain liberal agenda. 

What stunning irony!

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Hold on a minute, I think I see the problem . . .











-5yr -1yr   Fiscal Year 2012 in $ billion   +1yr +5yr
Change
View: people default radical census COFOG
Fed
(2)
Gov.
Xfer(3)
State
(3)
Local
(3)
Totalcharts
[+]  Pensions 819.7 0.0 160.8 36.8 1,017.3
[+]  Health Care 846.1 -322.2 428.5 127.7 1,080.1
[+]  Education 153.1 -103.1 247.4 643.7 941.0
[–]  Defense 902.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 903.3

[+]  Military defense 716.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 716.3

[+]  Civil defense 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

[+]  Veterans 129.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 130.7

[+]  Foreign military aid 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5

[+]  Foreign economic aid 43.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.8

[+]  R&D Defence 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

[+]  Defence n.e.c. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[+]  Welfare 451.9 -44.1 177.7 93.7 679.2
[+]  Protection 62.0 0.0 92.6 178.9 333.6
[+]  Transportation 102.6 -57.6 114.2 134.0 293.2
[+]  General Government 33.6 -1.0 33.8 53.5 119.9
[+]  Other Spending 199.6 -52.1 96.6 340.0 584.0
[+]  Interest 224.8 0.0 46.4 59.2 330.3
[+]  Balance 0.0 -0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0
[+]  Total Spending 3,795.6 -580.2 1,399.1 1,667.5 6,282.0
[+]  Federal Deficit 1,327.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,327.0
[+]  Gross Public Debt 16,350.9 0.0 1,092.4 1,712.9 19,156.2

The Crazies Have Taken the Asylum



Tampa should be an interesting show in the coming months: with the GOP convention we can expect the entire circus side show to arrive, complete with those who:

  1. Deny climate change
  2. Believe that gays can be "cured"
  3. Think that the only response to multiple gun murders over the last few years is for more citizens to carry guns
  4. Are convinced that Legitimate Rape (?) can't result in pregnancy
  5. The federal government is the problem instead of the tool of the problem
And of course the American Taliban will be out in force, waving their bibles as if they were bludgeons, hoping to fasten their heavy yellow incisors onto the jugular of American society to drag us back to the Dark Ages. What do Afghanistan and the Tea Party have in common? An excess of weapons and a fanatical belief that their way of thought is God's way of thought and anyone who dissents should be "marginalized."

What's a guy like Mitt to do? He wants to attract more "moderates" and "independents" to his flag but one glance at this People of Wal-Mart crowd has got to be off-putting to anyone capable of reading complex sentences and with a fair knowledge that Flat Earth theories are bunk.

Just recently Crazy Akin declared the madness of rape vs. pregnancy, much to the chagrin of the moderates within the GOP, who promptly reacted with due anger and condemnation. They demanded he step but, in a show of how little control the Sane Middle of the GOP has over their base, Akin has refused and, in fact, it has been revealed that Akin's supporters have continued to funnel money his way.

This is no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention. Though Akin's words were obviously ignorant and hysterical, they nevertheless reflect the thinking (?) of many in the GOP.

And so the Sideshow will rage on, with the typical Rogue's Gallery of Tea Party loonies: Michelle Bachman will be there, spouting her typicl inane misinformed biblical hysteria; Herman Cain will be there too, representing the Kill the Federal Government mantra of the Corporate New World Order; and, of course, we'll have The Donald, perhaps the purest member of the Tea Party loonies, flapping about with his ridiculous hair, harping on about Birther this and Birther that.

Meanwhile we have a sideshow sideshow with Ron Paul exploiting a gap in the Republican Party rules to allow the presence of the Libertarian Fringe despite not having won a single primary.

What a crew - how on earth is this Reality Challenged pack of loonies supposed to court the independents and the unaffiliated? Is it any wonder that the rest of the Industrialized West looks on with Fear and Wonder? This is the Superpower we're supposed to follow?

I'm tempted to steal a play from Michele Bachman and look to Hurricane Isaac, currently bearing down on Tampa,  to wipe this abomination from the face of the earth - but I have no confidence in that. We deserve this - in some way we deserve this.

Friday, August 24, 2012

The Talented Mister Romney



For those of you scoring at home you'll remember the 2004 presidential election as one that set new standards for odious campaign practices and sheer, shameless skullduggery to the point where a new term was introduced into the American Political lexicon of Dirty Trix: Swiftboating. What do you do if you're the incumbent with a documented record of draft-dodging during the Vietnam War and you're running against an opponent who's a documented war hero? History supplies us with the answer in the immortal words of Adolf Hitler:

"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes” 

The Modus Operandi in this case was to tell The Big Lie about Kerry's war record, cast is as beyond fictitious: to create a feeling in the American public that he was, in fact, a craven liar who's war record was actually dark and hideous and without honor. Real investigation, of course, showed this to be a grotesque attempt at smear tactics and absolutely false, but the damage was done. As Hitler's dark genius of misinformation could have told you: 
 
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it . . . The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."

Part two of the Swiftboating of John Kerry has relevance for today. It was important for the Bush Team to make him appear unsteady and confused and unreliable in a world of hijacked planes flying into high-rises and so he was painted as a "Flip-flopper". He was misquoted frequently and relentlessly as saying, "I was for the war before I was against it." The enduring image most Americans had of Kerry was successfully painted by his detractors: John Kerry the Flip-Flopper . . .
So what are we to make of the Talented Mister Romney? "As Governor of Massachusetts he supported gun-control, abortion, tackling climate change and and a requirement that everyone should buy health insurance, backed up with generous subsidies for those who could not afford it. Now, as he prepares to fly to Tampa to accept the Republican Party’s nomination for president on August 30th, he opposes all those things. A year ago he favoured keeping income taxes at their current levels; now he wants to slash them for everybody, with the rate falling from 35% to 28% for the richest Americans" (http://www.economist.com/node/21560864).
What are we to make of this man other than what the Republicans once said of Obama: here's a guy who will say anything to get elected?!
Which Romney is the Real Romney? The moderate bi-partisan of the past or the Far Right extremist of today? Or is there a real Romney at all? Personally, I think there is a real man instead all that slick packaging but stronger men than Romney have been hijacked by the Big Money of the Republican juggernaut. How many of us remember affable, straight-talking honest-John McCain and how quickly he became a joy-less pod-person once he won the nomination, hustled off and kept in increasing isolation by his Handlers and dictated to by the Higher Ups who foisted The Palin upon him as a running mate. It's instructive to note that McCain was back to himself in his concession speech the night of the election: humble, courageous, articulate and making a plea for conciliation and good grace. Many of us were relieved to see Honest John back and were glad to fall in love with him again. 
The writing on the wall was clear to me: if you accept The Party's nomination you become its puppet.
We watch with alarm as yet another One-Time sensible moderate morphs into a dangerously Fringe Social Conservative, shamelessly pandering to the Evangelical Taliban that has a white-knuckled Death Grip on the moral conscience of the Party, despite the fact that the vast amount of Independents out there view such things with loathing. 
But there's method to the Party's movements. The Goddamn General Public - the GDGP - gets whipped up into a frenzy over these kinds of things. That vast amount of unread, uneducated depressingly gullible Heartland People who sit smugly in their Bias Blind Spot, fulfilling Chuck Palahniuk's new vision of Big Brother's tactics:
 
“Old George Orwell got it backward. Big Brother isn’t watching. He’s singing and dancing. He’s pulling rabbits out of a hat. Big Brother’s busy holding your attention every moment you’re awake. He’s making sure you’re always distracted. He’s making sure you’re fully absorbed.

 He’s making sure your imagination withers. Until it’s as useful as your appendix. He’s making sure your attention is always filled.

 And this being fed, it’s worse than being watched. With the world always filling you, no one has to worry about what’s in your mind. With everyone’s imagination atrophied, no one will ever be a threat to the world.”

The Mad Dog Moderates paid attention when Judge Head of Lubbock, Texas predicted that if Obama were re-elected, "We are talking civil unrest, civil disobedience, possibly, possibly civil war. ... I'm not talking just talking riots here and there. I'm talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms, get rid of the dictator." We recognize the truthfulness of what he's predicting. The vast, unruly and ignorant mass of GDGP with their guns and their Taliban-esque moral law will be whipped into a fury and they will become dangerous and violent. Many of our friends overseas predicted with a certain smug certainty that America wasn't ready for a Black President, that the Rednecks would rebel and do so violently. That hasn't happened, yet, but the Mad Dog Moderates recognize that such a thing can happen.

And meanwhile, under cover of smoke and violence and revolt, who's keeping an eye on the biggest danger to the Middle-Class, the Corporate Elite?

Mister Romney is a perfect example of what we know and fear but can't convince the GDGP of: the rich get richer in America. Did Romney rise from the middle class (or lower) and build a multi-million dollar company? No, he was born rich and privileged and did what any half-smart scion of wealth would do: take millions and make them grow. Even Paris Hilton did that. The rich get richer because the system is made that way. The middle-class slips below levels seen in any industrialized western society but there's no real plan to stop the hemorrhaging.